But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Marshall Wilson

Other · U.S. Senate, West Virginia
?
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: In a 2024 voter-guide answer he says "Israel's world-view, principle, and priorities align more closely with those of the US Founding" than those of any other Middle East nation, without saying where he stands on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Reviewed by hand on 2026-10-09. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.

Asked in a November 2024 questionnaire whether the U.S. relationship with Israel is important, Wilson answered "Yes", saying Israel's "priorities align more closely with those of the US Founding" than any other Middle East nation. He added neither country is "always correct".

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

Wilson is a retired U.S. Army infantry officer and a Constitution Party candidate in West Virginia, and has run for statewide office there before.

In his iVoterGuide questionnaire for the November 5, 2024 West Virginia general election, asked "Is the United States' relationship with Israel important, and if so why?", he answered: "Yes. Israel's world-view, principle, and priorities align more closely with those of the US Founding than do those of any other nation in the Middle East." He grounded that in what he calls the three pillars of Western Civilization, one of them "the Judeo-Christian Ethic", and added: "This is not an assertion that either Israel or the US is always correct in all actions but that the US and Israel, when they each closely follows its own principles, will generally align."

That is a statement about the relationship, not about what the United States sends. He has set out no position on aid packages, arms sales or weapons transfers, and none on U.S. aid to Palestinians.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-13) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

  • 2024-11-05 [Current position; VERIFIED VERBATIM 2026-08-12; the main item on the card]: In his iVoterGuide questionnaire for the West Virginia general election, asked "Is the United States' relationship with Israel important, and if so why?", he answered in full:

"Yes. Israel's world-view, principle, and priorities align more closely with those of the US Founding than do those of any other nation in the Middle East. This is unsurprising considering the fact that the US was founded upon the three pillars of Western Civilization one of which is 'the Judeo-Christian Ethic.' This is not an assertion that either Israel or the US is always correct in all actions but that the US and Israel, when they each closely follows its own principles, will generally align." The closing sentence is his own qualification and is carried on the card, because quoting only the first sentence would state his position more strongly than he did.

  • No position located on aid packages, arms sales or weapons transfers. The card reports the relationship answer and says so.

Verification, 2026-08-12

Read in full, 2,195 words, with 17 substantive answers on the form, so this is a completed questionnaire rather than a blank one. His own profile. The answer matches verbatim. His campaign site was also opened and returned only 200 to 300 words with nothing on this subject, so the questionnaire is the source page.

The generated record, kept

Everything below comes from an initial search’s own notes, written before this card was rewritten, and is kept unchanged so that what was looked for, and what came back, stays on the record. Where it says nothing was found on this question, read it against the verified item above.

What was looked for, and what came back

  • **U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel:** There are no recorded public statements, legislative actions, or policy positions personally made by S.
  • **Characterization of the conflict:** In a candidate questionnaire for *iVoterGuide*, S.
  • **Rhetoric and lobbying:** There are no recorded public statements or actions by S.
  • **Safety and antisemitism:** S.

The rest of what an initial search returned on the questions with no answer

Each line above is the first sentence of what an initial search returned for that question. Where it said more after that sentence, the whole passage is reproduced here word for word, so the qualification stands on the record alongside the finding. Em dashes are rendered as hyphens to satisfy house style; no wording is changed.

### U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel There are no recorded public statements, legislative actions, or policy positions personally made by S. Marshall Wilson specifically addressing U.S. military aid, arms transfers, or weapons supply to Israel.

### Characterization of the conflict In a candidate questionnaire for *iVoterGuide*, S. Marshall Wilson outlined his perspective on Israel in relation to American foreign policy, stating:

> *"Israel's world-view, principle, and priorities align more closely with those of the US Founding than do those of any other nation in the Middle East. This is unsurprising considering the fact that the US was founded upon the three pillars of Western Civilization one of which is 'the Judeo-Christian Ethic.' This is not an assertion that either Israel or the US is always correct in all actions but that the US and Israel, when they each closely follows its own principles, will generally align."*

In a social media essay on originalist foreign policy dated June 12, 2022, Wilson separately elaborated on his broader principles regarding foreign entanglements, writing that foreign policy under the U.S. Constitution was conceived as defensive and that *"a well-governed nation must keep itself aloof from the quarrels of other nations, except to form alliances necessary for the national interest."* Beyond these foundational principles, Wilson has not publicly commented on the specific ongoing dynamics, military operations, or territorial disputes of the Israel/Palestine conflict.

### Rhetoric and lobbying There are no recorded public statements or actions by S. Marshall Wilson regarding Israel-related lobbying groups (such as AIPAC), foreign influence legislation, or political rhetoric concerning Israel lobbying.

### Safety and antisemitism S. Marshall Wilson has cited the Judeo-Christian ethic as a core pillar of Western civilization and American founding principles, but there are no recorded public statements, policy proposals, or official actions personally made or taken by Wilson specifically regarding antisemitism or physical safety measures for Jewish communities.

Sources consulted and read (5)

Not found

  • No position located on U.S. weapons, arms sales or military funding for the government of Israel.
  • No position located on U.S. aid to Palestinians, UNRWA or Gaza humanitarian funding.
  • This is a record of what was checked on 2026-08-11, not a claim that no statement exists anywhere.

Also in this race

  1. ✗ Shelley Moore Capito (Republican)
  2. ? Rachel Lee Fetty Anderson (Democrat)
  3. – Rio Phillips (write-in) (Independent)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.