But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check
Juan Vargas
- Backed with $31K by PACs we track that support U.S. weapons funding for the government of Israel (lifetime)
- Endorsed by AIPAC +1 more
Vargas applauded the delivery of critical U.S. military supplies to the government of Israel in April 2024, and in May urged the administration to settle its arms-shipment dispute with that government. The April statement also has him pressing the House to pass humanitarian aid for civilians in Gaza.
The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.
You asked Juan Vargas where they stand.
Deep Dive
Vargas represents California's 52nd District, which runs from San Diego to the Imperial Valley.
His clearest statement on the weapons question is his own, from April 2024: "I applaud President Biden for continuing to demonstrate that our commitment to Israel's security is unwavering, including by providing critical military supplies needed to defeat Hamas." The same statement takes the other side of the aid question in the same breath. He wrote that he shared the administration's commitment to delivering humanitarian assistance to Palestinian civilians, and that "I joined 190 of my colleagues in an effort to push the House to take action on a bill that would provide needed humanitarian aid for innocent civilians in Gaza."
His votes are worth grounding rather than leaving to the badges. The April 2024 package he supported carried $4 billion for the Iron Dome and David's Sling interceptor systems and $1.2 billion for Iron Beam, all of them systems for shooting things down; by that date the Gaza health ministry had reported 34,049 people killed, 14,685 of them children. Four weeks later the House took up a bill written to force delivery of the 2,000-pound and 500-pound bombs the administration had paused, which is a different kind of weapon and a different act, and he voted against it. The reported toll that day was 35,272 killed, 15,103 of them children. Eight days before that vote he had asked the administration to settle the arms-shipment dispute so as not to "embolden Iran, Hezbollah, or any of their proxies". He has published nothing explaining the vote itself.
Since May 2024 nothing further from him on this subject was located. His two recorded votes since then both ran against cutting U.S. military money for the government of Israel, the second of them in July 2026, by which date the reported toll stood at 73,246 killed. The full record, including his earlier work against boycotts of Israel and his statements on antisemitism, is on his research page.
The record
Supported sending weapons or funding in 5 of 6 tracked votes
• Vote record imported from official House Clerk roll calls for H.R. 6126, H.R. 8034, and H.R. 8369. Other position fields remain under investigation.
How this mark works
We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.
Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 5 of 6 tracked votes.)
The money
$31K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
In their words
AIPAC (2026 endorsement) · DMFI PAC (2026 endorsement)
Research log
The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.
U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel
- [Position, 2024-04-03] Statement on the administration's continued commitment to Israel's security, on his own House site, opened and confirmed word for word (450 words). Quoted: "I applaud President Biden for continuing to demonstrate that our commitment to Israel's security is unwavering, including by providing critical military supplies needed to defeat Hamas." The same statement: "I share the Administration's support for Israel's right and obligation to defend itself and its citizens against Hamas terrorists, and I share the Administration's commitment to continuing to prioritize delivering and distributing humanitarian assistance to Palestinian civilians across Gaza."
- [Position, 2024-05-08] Statement on the arms delay, opened and confirmed word for word (287 words): "The Biden Administration should work quickly to resolve any differences with our friend and ally Israel regarding arms shipments so we can ensure we do not embolden Iran, Hezbollah, or any of their proxies."
- [Position, 2024-05-16] He voted against H.R. 8369, the bill written to force delivery of the 2,000-pound and 500-pound bombs the administration had paused. The vote is a badge on this card with its own source. No statement from him explaining it was located, which is the one gap in an otherwise well-documented record: the statement eight days earlier asked for the shipments to resume.
- The munitions and dollar figures used on the card come from this site's own tracked-legislation registry, and the death tolls from its vote-context records; neither is new research and neither is hand-typed. See the verification log.
U.S. aid to Palestinians
- [Position, 2024-04-03] In the statement above: "I joined 190 of my colleagues in an effort to push the House to take action on a bill that would provide needed humanitarian aid for innocent civilians in Gaza." Confirmed word for word on the page. This is the only in-scope statement located from him on aid to Palestinians in the position band.
- [Reaction window, 2023-11-16] Statement supporting the creation of humanitarian corridors in Gaza. Not on the card summary. It also says: "Hamas consistently violates international law by embedding rockets, explosives, and other weapons in densely populated areas."
Characterization of the conflict
- [Position, 2024-04-03] From the April statement: "Every civilian death in this conflict is a tragedy, and my heart weeps for them and their loved ones. Each one is a victim of Hamas." And: "Without defeating Hamas, there can be no peace for Palestinians or Israelis."
- [Position, 2024-04-13] Statement on the Iranian attack on Israel, describing Iran as having attacked through proxies for decades.
- [Reaction window, 2023-10-27] An op-ed in the San Diego Union-Tribune characterizing the Hamas attack as barbarism and saying Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad are solely responsible for the Palestinian and Israeli lives lost. Not on the card summary. No page-level address for the op-ed came back resolved, so it is named here and not linked.
- [Earlier record, 2018-05-30] Statement on rocket attacks from Gaza, calling them heinous acts of terrorism and saying Israel has every right to defend itself.
Related rhetoric and lobbying
- [Position, 2024-01] Co-introduced H.R. 7155, the United States-Abraham Accords Cooperation and Security Act of 2024, with Rep. Diana Harshbarger, proposing a U.S. Food and Drug Administration office in Israel. This is about trade and regulatory cooperation, not about weapons or aid, and it is not on the card for that reason.
- [Earlier record, 2015-02] Co-sponsored H.R. 825, the United States-Israel Trade and Commercial Enhancement Act, with Rep. Peter Roskam, which used trade negotiations to discourage economic boycotts of Israel. Sourced to a Wikipedia overview of anti-boycott laws rather than to a primary record.
- [Earlier record, 2023-07-17] Signed a joint statement on the United States-Israel relationship, which states that Israel is the legitimate homeland of the Jewish people and that anti-Zionist voices which embolden antisemitism will not be allowed to disrupt the bipartisan consensus. A multi-member statement: its words are the signatories' collectively.
- [Undated] boughtbyzionism.org's page on him opens and names him. It is a third party writing about him rather than anything he said, so nothing from it is on the card.
- [Unconfirmed] An American Israel Public Affairs Committee post thanking him returns an error to every route tried and could not be read. The address is written out here. It would in any case be a third party speaking about him.
Safety and antisemitism (context)
- [Earlier record, 2017-02-22] Statement condemning bomb threats against Jewish Community Centers, including the Lawrence Family center in San Diego: "An attack against the Jewish community is an attack against all of us." Located through his own media archive; no single-item page address resolved.
- [Earlier record, 2018-04-12] A Holocaust Remembrance Day post on his own page.
- [Earlier record, 2019-03-04] Said Rep. Ilhan Omar was employing hurtful antisemitic stereotypes, reported by the Guardian in its account of that week. The Guardian page opens to a desktop browser.
- [Earlier record, 2022-07-12] Signed a Congressional Latino Jewish Caucus statement condemning a project that mapped Jewish community sites in Massachusetts. The carrier is a Facebook post by a colleague which returns an error to every route tried; the address is written out and the item is not on the card.
- [Earlier record, 2023-02-02] Co-sponsored H.Res. 92, recognising Israel as a democratic ally and condemning antisemitism.
Race and status context
- He is the incumbent and the nominee for this seat. His name appears in the California Secretary of State's primary statement of the vote.
Consulted
- His own House media archive, his press releases from 2018 to 2026, and the sources listed above. Nothing was found from him on conditioning U.S. weapons transfers, on the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees, or on an arms embargo.
Also in this race
- ?Mixed Jeff Belle (Republican)
All California candidates.
See everyone on the California ballot →But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.