But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check
Mike Johnson
- Backed with $25K by PACs we track that support U.S. weapons funding for the government of Israel (lifetime)
- Endorsed by AIPAC
Johnson demanded assurances that U.S. military aid to the government of Israel would not be delayed, and pressed the House to pass a $17.6 billion military aid package. At the Ariel settlement he declared the West Bank belongs to the Jewish people "by right".
✉ Copy a message to send them
We don’t have a campaign email on file yet. Copy this message and send it through their website or a public social account.
If you send this from your own email, cc replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org so we can post their answer.
Deep Dive
Johnson represents Louisiana's 4th District, across the northwest of the state around Shreveport, and he is the Speaker of the House.
The clearest thing on his record about U.S. weapons is what he did with the Speaker's control of the floor. In February 2024 he put a standalone $17.6 billion military aid package for the government of Israel before the House, telling colleagues "The need to support our closest ally and our own forces in the region has never been more pressing." Two months later, after the President threatened future military aid unless Israel took greater care to avoid civilian casualties, Johnson called it "appalling to watch anti-Israel rhetoric and support for an unconditional cease-fire grow among Democrats" and said it was time to "stop lecturing Israel on how it should best defend itself and begin equipping our friend with the resources necessary to eliminate the threat of Hamas, once and for all." And before bringing the April 2024 foreign aid package to a vote he pressed Secretary of State Antony Blinken for assurances about the Leahy Law, the provision that bars U.S. weapons for units credibly implicated in gross human rights violations; Blinken's letter told him the determinations "will not delay the delivery of any U.S. assistance" and that Israel would "receive the full amount appropriated by Congress".
On the territory itself he has gone further than any American official before him. In August 2025 he became the highest-ranking U.S. official ever to visit an Israeli settlement in the West Bank, and at Ariel he declared that the "mountains of Judea and Samaria" belong to the Jewish people "by right", quoting scripture and planting trees alongside Israeli settlers and the U.S. ambassador to Israel.
His view of Palestinian conditions is on the record from an earlier trip. Reporting on a February 2020 visit quotes him saying: "You hear in the US about how the Palestinians or the Arab people are oppressed in these areas, and have these terrible lives. None of that is true. We didn't see any of it." The same reporting notes the delegation did not travel to Gaza or meet Palestinian leaders.
In 2024 he took the campus question up as a leadership project, going to Columbia University and saying he would press the President to call in the National Guard if the protests were not contained, and describing the Antisemitism Awareness Act as "a House-wide effort to crack down on antisemitism on college campuses". Nothing located has him addressing U.S. humanitarian funding for Palestinians as a question in its own right.
The record
Supported sending weapons or funding in 5 of 5 tracked votes · Backs 0 of 1 tracked bills to restrict weapons transfers
How this mark works
We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.
Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 5 of 5 tracked votes.)
The money
$25K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
In their words
AIPAC (2026 endorsement)
Research log
The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.
U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel
- [Position, 2024-02-04] Times of Israel on the standalone $17.6 billion package. Opened and confirmed word for word. Johnson's letter to colleagues: "The need to support our closest ally and our own forces in the region has never been more pressing." And, on dropping the offsets that had blocked the earlier standalone bill: "The Senate will no longer have excuses, however misguided, against swift passage of this critical support for our ally." The committee breakdown on the page: $4 billion to replenish missile defense systems, $1.2 billion to counter short-range rockets and mortar threats, $4.4 billion to replenish U.S. stocks of weapons provided to Israel, $3.3 billion for U.S. operations in the region. The White House called the proposal "a cynical political maneuver" for arriving without Ukraine aid, border provisions or humanitarian funds for Gaza; that is the administration's characterization and is recorded here, not on the card.
- [Position, 2024-04-07] The Washington Times, read in full through the mirror linked here because the outlet's own address does not open. Confirmed word for word: "Since the massacre, it's been appalling to watch anti-Israel rhetoric and support for an unconditional cease-fire grow among Democrats in Washington, even as Hamas holds 130 Israelis and Americans hostage in Gaza." And: "It's time to stop lecturing Israel on how it should best defend itself and begin equipping our friend with the resources necessary to eliminate the threat of Hamas, once and for all." The article's context: the President had called for a ceasefire and threatened future U.S. military aid unless Israel took greater caution to avoid civilian casualties. Original address, for the record: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/apr/7/mike-johnson-calls-growing-anti-israel-feelings-ap/
- [Position, 2024-04-26] CBS News on Secretary Blinken's letter to him about the Leahy Law. Opened and confirmed word for word. The letter, per the article, assures him that the determinations "will not delay the delivery of any U.S. assistance" and that Israel would "receive the full amount appropriated by Congress". The article attributes the demand itself to "a source with knowledge of the letter", and separately quotes his own spokesperson: "Following Secretary Blinken's comments, the Speaker demanded an explanation from the Administration and assurances regarding the timely delivery of the military aid to Israel which the House passed Saturday." The card rests on the spokesperson's confirmation rather than the anonymous source.
- [Position, 2024-04-17] Associated Press explainer on the $95 billion House package he brought forward, which split the aid into separate votes. Opened; the page is heavily wrapped in unrelated headline listings, so no span from it is quoted and no structural claim is placed on the card from it.
- [Reaction window, 2023-10-25] First floor speech as Speaker, saying the first bill under his leadership would support military and security assistance to Israel. Carrier offered: i24 News. Not on the card summary.
- [Reaction window, 2023-10-30] Proposed a standalone $14.3 billion military assistance package paired with cuts to Internal Revenue Service funding, per Responsible Statecraft. Not on the card summary. The February 2024 package above is this proposal re-offered without the offsets, which is why his letter frames the offsets' removal as answering the Democrats' stated objection.
- [Reaction window, 2023-11-02] "Israel doesn't need a cease-fire. It needs its allies to ... deliver support now", per Mother Jones. The carrier's own rendering elides the passage, so it is not reproduced as continuous text. Not on the card summary in any case.
- His recorded votes on the tracked bills appear as badges on this card, and the grounding for each sits in the record section rather than in the prose.
U.S. aid to Palestinians
- Nothing located. No statement, vote explanation or leadership action addressing U.S. humanitarian funding for Palestinians, the aid pipeline, or the United Nations Relief and Works Agency was found under his name. The White House's February 2024 statement (above) faulted his package for omitting humanitarian funds for Gaza; that is the administration's framing of his bill, not a statement of his.
Characterization of the conflict
- [Position, 2025-08-04, published 2025-08-05] The Forward, an opinion column by Dan Perry, on his visit to the Ariel settlement with Republican colleagues including the U.S. ambassador to Israel. Opened and confirmed word for word: "Johnson declared that the 'mountains of Judea and Samaria' belong to the Jewish people 'by right,' quoting scripture and planting trees while flanked by Israeli settlers and Republican colleagues including Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel." The column states no U.S. official of his rank had ever before set foot in a West Bank settlement. The columnist's own argument about the visit is not adopted. A volunteer independently read the same column on 2026-08-20.
⚠ The Arab Center Washington DC digest renders the remark differently, as "The mountains of Judea and Samaria [the West Bank] are the rightful property of the Jewish people", with its own bracketed gloss. The card follows the Forward's rendering, which is the nearer carrier; the digest's variant is recorded here so the difference is visible.
- [Prior, 2020-02] Mother Jones on a sponsored trip to Israel and the occupied West Bank, quoting him: "You hear in the US about how the Palestinians or the Arab people are oppressed in these areas, and have these terrible lives. None of that is true. We didn't see any of it." Opened and confirmed word for word; the page carries the passage twice. The article adds that the itinerary filed with the House Ethics Committee shows the members did not travel to Gaza or meet Palestinian leaders or activists. Prior to the bands used on cards, and carried on the card as history for that reason.
- [Position, 2024-04-24] The Guardian quotes him on student protesters: "Some of these students apparently are unaware of the atrocities of October 7 or they're denying it." Opened and confirmed. The same article records that there is no evidence Hamas had a role in the protests, against his claim that it had endorsed them. A transcript of his Columbia remarks also opens.
Related rhetoric and lobbying
- [Reaction window, 2023-10-28] Remarks at a Republican Jewish Coalition summit, including "God is not done with America yet, and I know he's not done with Israel", per Mother Jones and a campaign-finance tracking page. Not on the card summary.
- [Position, 2024-04-26] Reported remarks that standing with Israel is a "biblical admonition". The only address offered is a YouTube short, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/z-BFNrluvig, which was not opened; nothing is claimed from it.
- [Position, 2024-05-31] Joined congressional leaders in inviting Prime Minister Netanyahu to address a joint meeting of Congress, which took place on 2024-07-24. Reported by the American Jewish Committee; the CBS News page offered alongside it, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/netanyahu-congress-address-july-24/, returned 406 to our search and is not relied on. A joint leadership action, not written up as his individual position.
- [Position, 2024-05-23] Remarks at a Capitol event marking Israeli Independence Day; only address offered is a YouTube video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMIvgrb62_M, not opened.
- Tracked funding totals appear as a badge on this card.
Safety and antisemitism (context)
- [Position, 2024-04-24] Jewish Insider on his Columbia University visit. Opened and confirmed: "My intention is to call the president myself after all this and relay to him what I've seen here and demand of him action." And, on the crowd: "They're openly rebellious and scornful, and that's fine because that's free speech, but when it crosses the line and they're physically intimidating and threatening their fellow students, that's something that must be stopped." He also called on the university's president to resign if the protests were not brought under control.
- [Position, 2024-05-01] The Nation quotes him describing the Antisemitism Awareness Act as "a House-wide effort to crack down on antisemitism on college campuses". Opened and confirmed. The article's own criticism of the bill is not adopted. Also covered by Jewish Federations and the Combat Antisemitism Movement.
- [Position, 2024-04-30] A Capitol news conference announcing a House-wide investigation into university funding, including the line "We will not allow antisemitism to thrive on campus". Both addresses offered are the same PBS NewsHour page, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-live-speaker-johnson-holds-news-conference-on-anti-israel-protests-and-universities, which could not be opened. Written out here; the wording is not quoted anywhere.
Race and status context
- Sitting representative for the district and Speaker of the House, qualified on Louisiana's certified list for the all-candidate November election, with a December runoff between the top two if nobody clears half the vote. Five candidates are on the ballot in this district.
- His tracked votes cover five of the six bills; there is no recorded vote for the amendment striking Israeli Cooperative Programs funding.
Also in this race
- ?Mixed Gordon Heslop (Republican)
- –No Position Found Mike Nichols (Republican)
- ✓Opposes Conrad Cable (Democrat)
- ✓Opposes Matthew Gromlich (Democrat)
All Louisiana candidates.
See everyone on the Louisiana ballot →But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.