But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Mike Nichols

–

How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

No recorded votes on the bills we track. We found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

Nothing located has Nichols taking a position on U.S. weapons or money for the government of Israel, or on U.S. aid to Palestinians. His candidate survey is blank, no campaign site was located, and his recorded campaign subjects are land use and spending at home.

✉ Copy a message to send them

We don’t have a campaign email on file yet. Copy this message and send it through their website or a public social account.

If you send this from your own email, cc replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org so we can post their answer.

Your record on weapons and funding for the government of Israel [ref: la4-nichols]

Dear Mike Nichols,

You're asking for my vote, and there is one question I can't find your answer to: should the United States keep sending weapons and funding to the government of Israel?

Your campaign hasn't said where you stand, and for many voters in this race it decides the vote. A short answer would help: will you vote against further weapons and funding for the government of Israel, or for enforceable conditions on that support?

I may share your answer publicly so other voters can see it.

Respectfully,
[Your name]

Deep Dive

Nichols is a Republican candidate in Louisiana's 4th District, a retired federal project manager and biologist from Pitkin.

His campaign has a clear subject and it is not foreign policy. What is on the record concerns carbon capture and sequestration projects in his part of the state, land rights, term limits and federal spending discipline. He has pledged to support congressional term limits and has been covered locally on the carbon capture question. His Ballotpedia profile records that he has not completed that site's 2026 candidate survey, which is where the question about Israel would sit, and no campaign website was located for him.

What was checked to reach that conclusion is listed on this card's research page. You are better placed to get an answer than we are. Ask Nichols directly, or at a candidate forum, and send us the reply: it goes on this page in his own words.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track

Nothing recorded (as of 2026-09-27) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.

Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel

Nothing located.

U.S. aid to Palestinians

Nothing located.

Characterization of the conflict

Nothing located.

Related rhetoric and lobbying

Nothing located.

Safety and antisemitism (context)

Nothing located.

Where the absence was checked

[Consulted, read 2026-08-20] His Ballotpedia profile. Opened. It records that he has not completed the 2026 candidate survey, which is the form that carries the question about the United States' relationship with Israel and which several candidates in this state have answered.
[Consulted, read 2026-08-20] Local radio coverage of his campaign and a term limits pledge. Both open, both name him, neither carries anything in scope.
[Consulted, read 2026-08-20] A prediction market profile. Opens; biography and odds only. Our earlier search cited this page as the basis for the absence findings, which it cannot support either way, so the absence was checked against the sources above instead.
No campaign website was located for him, and none is recorded in our records. The own-site check the standing rule requires could not be run, which is recorded rather than passed over.

Race and status context

Qualified on Louisiana's certified list for the all-candidate November election in the 4th District, with a December runoff between the top two if nobody clears half the vote. Five candidates are on the ballot.
He has held no federal office, so there are no recorded votes on this card.

Also in this race

? Gordon Heslop (Republican)
✗ Mike Johnson (Republican)
✓ Conrad Cable (Democrat)
✓ Matthew Gromlich (Democrat)

All Louisiana candidates.