But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check
Bill Huizenga
- Backed with $20K by PACs we track that support U.S. weapons funding for the government of Israel (lifetime)
- Endorsed by AIPAC +1 more
- Sits on House Foreign Affairs
Huizenga voted for the April 2024 package of U.S. aid to the government of Israel, saying it must have the resources to defend itself from Iran and Hamas. In 2026 he became an original cosponsor of a bill to dismantle the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees.
The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.
You asked Bill Huizenga where they stand.
Deep Dive
Huizenga represents Michigan's 4th District, on the Lake Michigan shore around Holland and Kalamazoo.
He explained the April 2024 vote himself, and the explanation is specific about who the money is for: "Regarding aid for Israel, I supported this measure because we must ensure our greatest ally in the Middle East has the resources to defend itself from Iran, Hamas, and additional terrorist proxy groups in the region that wish to do our ally harm." He voted the other way on the Ukraine supplemental the same day, which is why the statement takes each one separately. A week earlier, on the night Iran launched its assault, he had pressed the Senate majority leader to move the House-passed bills: "There are House-passed bills containing aid to Israel sitting in the Senate that Senator Schumer can bring up immediately."
The package he backed carried $4 billion for the Iron Dome and David's Sling interceptor systems and $1.2 billion for Iron Beam, systems for shooting things down, and by that date the Gaza health ministry had reported 34,049 people killed, 14,685 of them children. Four weeks later he voted for the bill written to force delivery of the 2,000-pound and 500-pound bombs the administration had paused, which is a different kind of weapon and a different act, at a reported 35,272 killed, 15,103 of them children. He voted against striking $500 million for Israeli Cooperative Programs in 2025, and against the July 2026 amendment that would have barred the year's funds for Israel and cut $3.3 billion from Foreign Military Financing, taken at a reported 73,246 killed.
On the other side of the question his position is a bill. He is an original cosponsor of H.R. 9680, the Replace UNRWA with Real Humanitarian Assistance Act, which would require the Secretary of State to deliver and then begin carrying out "a detailed plan and timeline for the phased wind-down of UNRWA operations", transferring its schools, clinics and social services for Palestinian refugees, and the funding for them, to host-country governments or other organizations, while requiring that critical humanitarian services not be interrupted. That is the only position he has taken on U.S. aid to Palestinians, and it points at ending the current channel for it. His campaign's five themes and his official issues index carry no foreign policy at all; the rest is on his research page.
The record
Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes
House Committee on Foreign Affairs
• As of September 25, 2026, his campaign issues page sets out five themes: inflation and family budgets, American energy, local jobs, southwest Michigan values and delivering results. It does not mention foreign policy, Israel, Gaza or foreign aid, and none of the twelve topics in his official House issues index is foreign affairs.
• Signed on as an original cosponsor of H.R. 9680, the Replace UNRWA with Real Humanitarian Assistance Act. It would require the Secretary of State to deliver, and then begin carrying out, a strategy for the phased wind-down of UNRWA, the UN agency that runs schools, clinics and social services for Palestinian refugees. The strategy would name the host-country governments or other organizations to take over its programs and the entities to fund them, and critical humanitarian services could not be interrupted.
• Published a statement setting out his reasoning on the three emergency supplementals the House took separately that day, arguing that U.S. money should go to the government of Israel so that it has the resources to defend itself.
• Publicly pressed the Senate majority leader to bring up House-passed bills sending U.S. aid to the government of Israel, in a statement issued the evening Iran launched its assault on Israel.
How this mark works
We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.
See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.
Voted to send weapons or funding in more than half of their recorded tracked votes. (Supported sending weapons or funding in 6 of 6 tracked votes.)
The money
$20K in lifetime support from the five lobbying groups we track
In their words
AIPAC (2026 endorsement) · Republican Jewish Coalition (2026 endorsement)
Research log
The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.
U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel
- [Position, 2024-04-20] Statement on the foreign aid package, on his own House site, opened and confirmed word for word (383 words). Quoted: "When considering emergency supplementals, we must examine each supplemental individually." And: "Regarding aid for Israel, I supported this measure because we must ensure our greatest ally in the Middle East has the resources to defend itself from Iran, Hamas, and additional terrorist proxy groups in the region that wish to do our ally harm." The same statement explains his vote against the Ukraine supplemental on cost grounds and his position on the Indo-Pacific.
- [Position, 2024-04-13] Statement the evening of the Iranian assault, confirmed word for word: "There are House-passed bills containing aid to Israel sitting in the Senate that Senator Schumer can bring up immediately."
- [Position, 2024-05-29] At a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing with the Secretary of State he is reported to have called the withholding of certain weapons shipments to the government of Israel "a complete slap in the face". The only carrier located is a YouTube video on a third-party channel whose page yields 43 words, the title alone, and no transcript. We could not verify this claim against any source we could open, so it stays here as an unverified claim and is not on the card. The address is written out for anyone who wants to watch it.
- [Position, undated, read 2026-08-19] His official issue page carries no position on transfers.
- The munitions and dollar figures used on the card come from this site's own tracked-legislation registry, and the death tolls from its vote-context records. See the verification log.
U.S. aid to Palestinians
- [Position, 2026-07-14] Original cosponsor of H.R. 9680, the Replace UNRWA with Real Humanitarian Assistance Act. The cosponsor page records 30 cosponsors, 24 of them original, and names him. The bill text was read in full: it requires the Secretary of State to submit "a strategy to dismantle United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East operations", including "a detailed plan and timeline for the phased wind-down of UNRWA operations" and an assessment of all its programs, with transfer of programs and funding to host-country governments or other organizations and a requirement that critical humanitarian services not be interrupted.
- Nothing else from him on humanitarian funding or the aid pipeline was located.
Characterization of the conflict
- [Position, 2024-04-13] In the statement above, describing Iran as the instigator and saying he stands with Israel.
- [Position, 2024-04-15] An interview with ABC 57 on the Israel-Iran conflict.
- [Reaction window, 2023-10-10] Statement calling the attack barbaric and condemning the savagery and atrocities committed by Hamas. Not on the card summary.
- [Reaction window, 2023-10-19] Newsletter column calling the attacks appalling and describing Hamas, Hezbollah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad as Iranian-backed terrorist groups. Not on the card summary. The same column records his reintroduction of the No U.S. Financing for Iran Act.
Related rhetoric and lobbying
- [Position, 2024-04-15] Statements after House passage of the No U.S. Financing for Iran Act, framing it as holding Iran accountable and protecting Israel. About Iran's access to the financial system, not about American transfers.
- [Position, 2026-06-02] Introduced the Deport the Terrorists Act, framed as national security. Immigration rather than transfers.
- His funding block records lifetime support from one of the five tracked committees and nothing in the current cycle, which is a badge on this card. Nothing he has said about it was located.
Safety and antisemitism (context)
- [Earlier record, 2021-06-04] Co-sponsored the Preventing Anti-Semitic Hate Crimes Act, calling the rise in anti-Jewish violence appalling and completely unacceptable.
- [Position, 2024-05-09] In his constituent newsletter he denounced campus encampments and demonstrations and said threats of violence are not protected speech.
- [Position, 2025-08-21] One of seven signatories to the Michigan Republican delegation's letters asking the State Department to deny a visa to a Palestinian speaker at a Detroit conference and asking the Justice Department to investigate the conference. Read in full on the lead signatory's site; the signatories are Moolenaar, Bergman, Huizenga, Walberg, Barrett, McClain and James. Collective wording only. Shared with other candidates on this site.
Race and status context
- He is the incumbent and the nominee for this seat. His campaign's issues page sets out five themes, none of them foreign policy.
Consulted
- His House site releases and newsletters, congress.gov's cosponsor record and bill text for H.R. 9680, ABC 57, and a YouTube video that yields only its title.
Also in this race
- ?Mixed Sean McCann (Democrat)
- –No Position Found Shafina Che Barnett (Green)
All Michigan candidates.
See everyone on the Michigan ballot →But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.