But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Kimberly Hardy

Democrat · U.S. House, North Carolina District 7
–
How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

No recorded votes on the bills we track. We found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

Hardy has not spoken publicly on U.S. weapons or money for the government of Israel, or on U.S. aid to Palestinians. No statement was found in source-checked research across 5 sources.

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

5 sources checked and resolved, every one listed on the research page. Most candidates at this level have simply never been asked.

You are better placed to change that than we are. Ask Hardy directly, or at a candidate forum, and send us the reply: it goes on this page in their own words, which is worth more than anything we could write about them.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track
Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-23) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.
Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

What was looked for, and what came back

  • **U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel:** There is no public record of personal statements or actions by Kimberly Hardy regarding U.S. military aid or weapons sales to Israel.
  • **Characterization of the conflict:** There is no public record of personal statements or actions by Kimberly Hardy characterizing the Israel/Palestine conflict.
  • **Rhetoric and lobbying:** Material returned; set out in full below.
  • **Safety and antisemitism:** Material returned; set out in full below.

What else came back

The card's claim is about what the United States sends, and no position was found there. These sections returned material beyond a bare verdict. It is reproduced word for word so nothing found is lost; none of it is a position on U.S. weapons or money. Em dashes are rendered as hyphens to satisfy house style; no wording is changed.

### Rhetoric and lobbying Kimberly Hardy's involvement in Israel-related political issues has primarily occurred through her administrative role as Second Vice Chair of the North Carolina Democratic Party (NCDP):

* **October 11, 2023:** Hardy was appointed to mediate an internal NCDP dispute involving progressive party activists and Jewish Democrats over controversial anti-Israel party resolutions. She canceled the scheduled mediation session on October 11, 2023, citing media inquiries directed at state party leadership. * **November 2023:** During an NCDP Executive Committee vote regarding the formal chartering/affiliation of a proposed NCDP Jewish Caucus, Hardy was one of several state party leaders who recorded an abstention.

### Safety and antisemitism * **November 2023:** Following the NCDP Executive Committee vote in November 2023, local Jewish Democratic organizers publicly criticized Hardy and other state party leaders for abstaining on the recognition of the Jewish Caucus, arguing that leadership silence fostered an environment where antisemitism could persist unaddressed.

Beyond her participation and abstention as an officer during internal NCDP executive proceedings, there is no public record of personal policy statements or explicit public stances by Hardy regarding safety and antisemitism.

Sources consulted and resolved (5)

Not found

  • No position located on U.S. weapons, arms sales or military funding for the government of Israel.
  • No position located on U.S. aid to Palestinians, UNRWA or Gaza humanitarian funding.
  • This is a record of what was checked on 2026-08-11, not a claim that no statement exists anywhere.

Also in this race

  1. ✗ David Rouzer (Republican)
  2. ✓ Maad Abu-Ghazalah (Libertarian)

But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open Find Your Candidates for votes, funding and contact details.