Kasie Dr. Whitener
In a campaign post titled Violence is not a Game, Whitener wrote that a South Carolina senator posted "game on" after Israel bombed Iran, and that "Use of military force for any purpose is not a game". She argues the Senate should reassert oversight.
Whitener is a writer, business owner, radio host and educator at the University of South Carolina, and the Libertarian candidate for the U.S. Senate in South Carolina.
Her campaign post Violence is not a Game sets the non-aggression principle against the events of one week: "We started the week with ICE raids and the deployment of the National Guard at the behest of the President. We ended the week with Israel bombing Iran and one of our South Carolina Senators posting 'game on.'" She then writes: "Use of military force for any purpose is not a game."
What follows is about the Senate's role: "The Senate has the power of oversight." Her objection is to treating military force lightly and to Congress not exercising oversight. She does not state a position on U.S. weapons or money for the government of Israel, or on U.S. aid to Palestinians.
Research
Characterization of the conflict
- [Current position; VERIFIED VERBATIM 2026-08-12; CARD-LEADING]: Her campaign post "Violence is not a Game", published on her positions page. It opens on the non-aggression principle she encountered on joining the South Carolina Libertarian Party in 2012, then: "Last week was a trial for the non-aggression principle. We started the week with ICE raids and the deployment of the National Guard at the behest of the President. We ended the week with Israel bombing Iran and one of our South Carolina Senators posting 'game on.'"
"Use of military force for any purpose is not a game." And on the remedy: "The Senate has the power of oversight. We should be monitoring U.S..." The page truncates the rest behind a "Show more" control.
- The first search dated this 2026-07-15. The page does not display a date, so the date is the first search’s and is not confirmed. The post's references to Israel bombing Iran and to National Guard deployments are consistent with mid-2026.
U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel
- No position located. Her objection is to the treatment of military force and to the absence of congressional oversight, and the card does not convert that into a position on what the United States sends.
Verification, 2026-08-12
Rendered in a browser: 679 words. **This is a partial read and it is recorded as one.** The page collapses each position behind a "Show more" control, and those controls were not expanded, so there is more of her writing on this page than is quoted here. 679 words is also, by coincidence, the figure that misled an earlier check into declaring true content absent, which is why the partiality is stated rather than assumed away. Everything quoted above was matched character for character against what was rendered.
The generated record, kept
Everything below comes from the first search’s own notes, written before this card was rewritten, and is kept unchanged so that what was looked for, and what came back, stays on the record. Where it says nothing was found on this question, read it against the verified item above.
What was looked for, and what came back
- **U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel:** There are no public statements or official campaign policies from Dr. Kasie Whitener explicitly addressing U.S. military aid or weapons shipments to Israel specifically.
- **Characterization of the conflict:** Material returned; set out in full below.
- **Rhetoric and lobbying:** On July 15, 2026, Whitener publicly criticized political rhetoric surrounding Middle East conflicts after a sitting South Carolina senator posted "game on" following military strikes involving Israel and Iran, responding that "use of military force for any purpose is not a game".
- **Safety and antisemitism:** There are no public statements, legislative actions, or campaign positions from Dr. Kasie Whitener specifically addressing antisemitism or safety regarding Jewish or Israeli communities.
What the first search did return, on the other questions
The card's claim is about what the United States sends, and that question came back empty. These questions did return material. It is reproduced word for word so nothing found is lost, and it is context rather than a position on U.S. weapons or money. Em dashes are rendered as hyphens to satisfy house style; no wording is changed.
### Characterization of the conflict Dr. Kasie Whitener has not publicly offered a detailed characterization of the overall Israel/Palestine conflict. Her public comments on Middle East policy have focused broadly on non-interventionism and peaceful coexistence; on July 15, 2026, she publicly questioned the role of Congress in determining how nations coexist and urged a non-frivolous approach to military conflict in the region.
The rest of what the first search returned on the questions with no answer
Each line above is the first sentence of what the first search returned for that question. Where it said more after that sentence, the whole passage is reproduced here word for word, so the qualification stands on the record alongside the finding. Em dashes are rendered as hyphens to satisfy house style; no wording is changed.
### U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel There are no public statements or official campaign policies from Dr. Kasie Whitener explicitly addressing U.S. military aid or weapons shipments to Israel specifically. As part of her overall platform, she advocates for strict congressional oversight of foreign policy, fiscal restraint, and non-interventionism. On July 15, 2026, in a campaign post regarding Middle East military strikes, she stated that the "use of military force for any purpose is not a game" and argued that Congress must reassert oversight over foreign military involvement.
### Rhetoric and lobbying On July 15, 2026, Whitener publicly criticized political rhetoric surrounding Middle East conflicts after a sitting South Carolina senator posted "game on" following military strikes involving Israel and Iran, responding that "use of military force for any purpose is not a game". There are no recorded statements or actions from Whitener directly addressing Israel-related lobbying or interest groups.
Sources consulted and read (4)
- localcandidates.org
- localcandidates.org
- localcandidates.org
- kasiesouthcarolina.com (published 2025-07-05)
Not found
- No position located on U.S. weapons, arms sales or military funding for the government of Israel.
- No position located on U.S. aid to Palestinians, UNRWA or Gaza humanitarian funding.
- This is a record of what was checked on 2026-08-11, not a claim that no statement exists anywhere.
Also in this race: Annie Andrews (Democrat), Jack Ellison (Other), Cindy E Glaser (Independent), Donavan Arthur Mr Louis (Independent), Reece Wright-Mcdonald (Independent), Darline Graham Nordone (Republican), Paul Sedletsky (Independent), Edward Iv Strunge (Other) · All South Carolina candidates.
See the full record →But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Every claim on this page goes through at least two verification steps. Open the interactive card for votes, funding and contact details.