But What Can You Do? tracks where 2026 candidates stand on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. How we check

Christina Clement

Declared write-in candidate. Not printed on the ballot.

How this mark works

We track key votes on sending U.S. weapons and money to the government of Israel. A check means every tracked vote they cast came down against sending more, on the side of peace and de-escalation. A question mark means a mixed record: they sided with sending up to half of the time. An X means they voted to send more weapons and money in over half of their tracked votes, even as the way those weapons and dollars were being used became more and more obvious. At exactly half, money this election cycle from a lobbying group we track, or an endorsement from a group that backs sending weapons, makes it an X. Only votes actually cast are counted. Where a candidate has no recorded votes on these bills, the mark comes instead from a reviewed reading of their public record (money from the lobbying groups we track, endorsements, and their own words since January 26, 2024). There an X also covers fully backing the conduct of the war by the government of Israel without significant reservations, and a question mark also covers speaking about Israel without saying clearly where they stand on U.S. weapons and funding. A dash means No Position Found: we found nothing in their own words about Israel, Gaza or the war.

See a dash? Ask the candidate where they stand, then send us their answer and we'll review it and update the mark. Or volunteer to help review candidates.

Two reviewers, reading the public record as a whole, agree: In a November 2024 court filing she proposed measures that she wrote "will be a global solution to repair the failing economy" and end the Israel/Palestine war, without saying where she stands on U.S. weapons and funding for the government of Israel. Reviewed by hand on 2026-10-09. This candidate has no recorded tracked floor votes.

Clement has not spoken publicly on U.S. weapons or money for the government of Israel, or on U.S. aid to Palestinians. No statement was found in source-checked research across 4 sources.

✉ Email the campaign Website ↗

The email has replies@butwhatcanyoudo.org in cc, so we can post their answer on their page in their own words; remove it if you prefer. Keep the subject line as it is, add your name, and send.

Deep Dive

4 sources checked and read, every one listed on the research page. Most candidates at this level have simply never been asked.

You are better placed to change that than we are. Ask Clement directly, or at a candidate forum, and send us the reply: it goes on this page in their own words, which is worth more than anything we could write about them.

The money

Checked the five lobbying groups we track; no direct 2026 support found

2026 support from the five lobbying groups we track

Nothing recorded (as of 2026-07-13) from the five lobbying groups we track; earlier cycles and earmarked donations not yet tracked.

Support-only OpenFEC data. Opposition independent expenditures are excluded.

Research log

The notes behind this card: what we looked at, what we found, and where each item came from.

What was looked for, and what came back

**U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel:** There is no public record of statements, policy positions, or actions by Rev.
**Characterization of the conflict:** While Clement made brief references to the "Palestine War" in legal court filings submitted in 2024 for her case *Clement v.
**Rhetoric and lobbying:** There is no public record of statements or actions by Rev.
**Safety and antisemitism:** There is no public record of statements or policy proposals by Rev.

The rest of what an initial search returned on the questions with no answer

Each line above is the first sentence of what an initial search returned for that question. Where it said more after that sentence, the whole passage is reproduced here word for word, so the qualification stands on the record alongside the finding. Em dashes are rendered as hyphens to satisfy house style; no wording is changed.

### U.S. military aid and weapons to Israel There is no public record of statements, policy positions, or actions by Rev. Dr. Christina Loren Clement regarding U.S. military aid or weapons sales to Israel.

### Characterization of the conflict While Clement made brief references to the "Palestine War" in legal court filings submitted in 2024 for her case *Clement v. Garland* (D.D.C. 1:24-cv-00479), as well as theological references to biblical Israel in filings dated February 2, 2025, she has not published explicit policy positions or public commentary characterizing the political or historical nature of the modern Israel/Palestine conflict.

### Rhetoric and lobbying There is no public record of statements or actions by Rev. Dr. Christina Loren Clement concerning Israel-related lobbying, political rhetoric, or organizations involved in American-Israeli political advocacy.

### Safety and antisemitism There is no public record of statements or policy proposals by Rev. Dr. Christina Loren Clement specifically addressing antisemitism or safety and security concerns regarding the Jewish community.

Sources consulted and read (4)

fec.gov (published 2019-01-01)
stateoflocnation.com [does not name the candidate in the text we could read]
wsimg.com [does not name the candidate in the text we could read]
wsimg.com [does not name the candidate in the text we could read]

Not found

No position located on U.S. weapons, arms sales or military funding for the government of Israel.
No position located on U.S. aid to Palestinians, UNRWA or Gaza humanitarian funding.
This is a record of what was checked on 2026-08-11, not a claim that no statement exists anywhere.

Also in this race

? Jon Ossoff (Democrat)
✗ Mike Collins (Republican)
– Al Bartell (write-in) (Independent)

All Georgia candidates.